Structured research workflow
One environment for the six stages instead of scattered tools and files.
SARAP is built for the practical work of a research project: screening literature in three languages, structuring evidence, developing a defensible design, writing from recorded claims and arriving at a supervisor checkpoint with the record already in order.
One environment for the six stages instead of scattered tools and files.
Every claim can be traced back to the evidence record and source behind it.
Screening decisions, evidence, design and drafting stay in one project context.
Problem, questions, hypotheses and method are developed as a connected chain.
Drafting works from a claim registry linked to recorded evidence.
Unsupported claims, contradictory evidence and citation gaps are surfaced as findings.
Each object shows whether it is suggested, drafted or verified.
Checkpoints present the recorded state rather than an informal summary.
Because every object keeps its origin and decision history, a question at a checkpoint — why is this claim here, where did this figure come from — has a recorded answer.
Project context, lifecycle position, readiness and blockers in one persistent frame.
Structured evidence records with field-level provenance and verification state.
The traceable chain from evidence and gaps to design, sampling and analysis plan.
Explore how SARAP connects research evidence, academic reasoning, verification and institutional governance across the research lifecycle.