For universities

Research infrastructure, not another reporting form

SARAP gives faculties and doctoral programmes a shared research vocabulary and an inspectable record of how each project reached its current state, from the sources screened to the supervisor decision that closes it.

Institutional value

Visibility that points to recorded objects, not to a score

SARAP does not calculate an aggregate research-quality score. Attention is directed to specific recorded exceptions — a blocked stage, unverified evidence, an unsupported claim — each shown with the object it originates from.

Standardised workflows

The same lifecycle vocabulary across faculties and doctoral programmes.

Transparent supervision

Checkpoints show what was reviewed, by whom and with what decision.

Evidence and citation traceability

Claims, citations and evidence remain inspectable after the fact.

Institutional research records

Completed projects close into a structured, archivable record.

Governance checkpoints

Stage transitions depend on recorded conditions, not on navigation.

Research quality visibility

Attention is directed to specific recorded exceptions, not to a score.

Doctoral research management

Portfolio-level view of stage, blockers and verification state.

Explore institutional research

How institutional oversight appears in the platform

The demo environment includes an institutional research view: a portfolio of projects with their lifecycle position, governance checkpoints and recorded exceptions, plus drill-down into the project objects behind each one.

Institutional deployment, integrations with external research systems and formal reporting exchanges are not part of the current prototype. This page describes the platform as implemented; anything beyond it is a matter for a later institutional phase.
SARAP · Institutional Research
Institutional Research

Portfolio view of stage, governance state and recorded exceptions across projects.

SARAP · Institutional Record
Institutional Record

Completion gate, supervisor decision and archived research record for a closed project.

SARAP research lifecycle
  1. 01
    Discover

    Literature discovery and source selection.

  2. 02
    Analyze

    Evidence extraction, structuring and research-gap analysis.

  3. 03
    Develop

    Research problem, objectives, questions, hypotheses and methodology.

  4. 04
    Write

    Evidence-grounded manuscript development with claims and citations.

  5. 05
    Review

    Research integrity, citation integrity and methodological consistency.

  6. 06
    Complete

    Supervisor-governed research completion and institutional record.

Stages advance on recorded researcher and supervisor decisions — never automatically.

Build research on evidence.
Keep every decision traceable.

Explore how SARAP connects research evidence, academic reasoning, verification and institutional governance across the research lifecycle.