Standardised workflows
The same lifecycle vocabulary across faculties and doctoral programmes.
SARAP gives faculties and doctoral programmes a shared research vocabulary and an inspectable record of how each project reached its current state, from the sources screened to the supervisor decision that closes it.
SARAP does not calculate an aggregate research-quality score. Attention is directed to specific recorded exceptions — a blocked stage, unverified evidence, an unsupported claim — each shown with the object it originates from.
The same lifecycle vocabulary across faculties and doctoral programmes.
Checkpoints show what was reviewed, by whom and with what decision.
Claims, citations and evidence remain inspectable after the fact.
Completed projects close into a structured, archivable record.
Stage transitions depend on recorded conditions, not on navigation.
Attention is directed to specific recorded exceptions, not to a score.
Portfolio-level view of stage, blockers and verification state.
The demo environment includes an institutional research view: a portfolio of projects with their lifecycle position, governance checkpoints and recorded exceptions, plus drill-down into the project objects behind each one.
Portfolio view of stage, governance state and recorded exceptions across projects.
Completion gate, supervisor decision and archived research record for a closed project.
Literature discovery and source selection.
Evidence extraction, structuring and research-gap analysis.
Research problem, objectives, questions, hypotheses and methodology.
Evidence-grounded manuscript development with claims and citations.
Research integrity, citation integrity and methodological consistency.
Supervisor-governed research completion and institutional record.
Stages advance on recorded researcher and supervisor decisions — never automatically.
Explore how SARAP connects research evidence, academic reasoning, verification and institutional governance across the research lifecycle.